Saturday, May 16, 2009

Obstruction (or Destruction) of Justice

When you hear the term "Obstruction of Justice", what pops in your mind?  If you are like most law abiding citizens, you probably think of a group mobsters trying to intimidate witnesses or a secretary deleting computer files seconds before a search warrant is served.  

 

            Well, the purpose of today's entry is to recalibrate your thinking.  The crime or charge commonly referred to as "Obstruction of Justice" should really be called "Making a Police Officer Mad."   If you find yourself in a situation where you make a police officer mad, the odds are pretty good that you are going to get charged with Obstruction of Justice.   In Georgia, Obstruction of Justice is defined as follows:

 

Obstructing or hindering law enforcement officers:

(a) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (b) of this Code section, a person who knowingly and willfully obstructs or hinders any law enforcement officer in the lawful discharge of his official duties is guilty of a misdemeanor.

(b) Whoever knowingly and willfully resists, obstructs, or opposes any law enforcement officer, prison guard, correctional officer, probation supervisor, parole supervisor, or conservation ranger in the lawful discharge of his official duties by offering or doing violence to the person of such officer or legally authorized person is guilty of a felony and shall, upon conviction thereof, be punished by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than five years.

            Most Obstruction charges arise when people run from police.   If you run, you will be charged with Obstruction. What is more interesting is that it doesn't matter if you actually did anything wrong, initially.   If an officer has a valid reason for stopping you (an articulable suspicion), and you decide to take off running, you have just hindered his lawful discharge of official duties and you will be charged with Obstruction.

            Also, if you lie to a police officer, you will be charged with Obstruction. (lying to him/her is also likely to make them mad).  Duke v. State, 205 Ga. App. 689, 423 S.E.2d 427 (1992); Carter v. State, 222 Ga. App. 397, 474 S.E.2d 228 (1996). 

            What that average citizen really needs to understand is the criminal liability associated with "touching" a police officer.   If you touch a police officer during the commission of his/her duties, then you may be charged with felony obstruction, which carries a maximum of five years in prision.   Felony obstruction requires that you actually do violence or offer to do violence towards an officer.   If you touch a police officer, he will conclude that is violence.

            As an example, let's assume that you are watching a 6' 4" officer that weighs 240lbs arrest your pregnant 5' 2", 120lb pregnant daughter.  The officer has your daughter down on the ground with his knee in her back while she screams for you to help her because she can't breathe.  If you touch the officer and ask him to stop, you will be charged with felony obstruction.   

            So what’s the moral of this BLOG?  It’s simple, “Don’t make a Police Officer mad.”  If you do, the odds are very good that you will find yourself arrested. 

            If you need help, call me at 678-383-1690 or visit my website at www.napierlawllc.com.  If for whatever reason I can't help you, I'll point you in the direction of someone who can.

3 comments:

  1. " As an example, let's assume that you are watching a 6' 4" officer that weighs 240lbs arrest your pregnant 5' 2", 120lb pregnant daughter. The officer has your daughter down on the ground with his knee in her back while she screams for you to help her because she can't breathe. If you touch the officer and ask him to stop, you will be charged with felony obstruction."

    I might be arrested but in such circumstances the cop would be dead.

    ReplyDelete
  2. By your description, then recording the actions of an officer during a routine traffic stop is not obstruction of justice. Running from the officer, lying to the officer and touching the officer are the only justifiable charges of obstruction of justice an officer can make.

    The recording of a police officer has yet to be shown as compromising of their safety, or obstructing them in their duties.
    The officer is not being asked to hold the camera.
    The officer is not having the camera shoved into their face.
    If anything, the camera recording actually inhibits the civilian from obstructing the officer!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I would have a hard time imagining a situation where holding a camera results in an obstruction charge. However, just realize that anytime you make an officer mad, they're probably going to arrest you and figure out a charge later.

      Delete